The question we need to ask ourselves as consumers is whether
this is a positive development. I actually see arguments on both sides. On one
side of the debate is the argument that we always have the free will to choose
if we want a product or not. Of course we can see targeted advertising all day
long, but if we do not want the product then we will not be forced to purchase
it. For example, when I changed my facebook status after I got engaged, I
received a ton of advertisements for wedding related goods. They were a nuisance,
but since I was not interested in any of those products I did not buy the
services. It was annoying, but it was no more than an annoyance. I still have
the independence and free will as a consumer to choose what I dedicate my
resources to.
On the other side of the debate is the argument about
privacy. If cookies are installed on our computers without us knowing, and if companies
are allowed to harvest our information without telling us they are doing so,
where do we draw the line? As I was reading the chapter I thought of the
current controversy as the NSA leaks have revealed the government has been
harvesting our phone records. Whether you support this or not, it does beg the
question: how much information will they take from individuals before stopping
for privacy reasons? Will this evolve to a point where companies can have
information on you that you truly feel uncomfortable with them having?
While I understand
both sides, I currently fall into the first category of people who see the
value in using this data, as long as it is only used to a certain point. As the
chapter says, “we are being quantified.” No one wants to think of themselves as
simply a number, thrown in with billions of other numbers to find a marketing
pattern. However, this is the direction marketing has been going for decades
and it has allowed customers, conversely, to be treated more as individuals.
This, I think, is fascinating. We may just be a number when it comes to the
data we provide, but that data allows marketers to target us with products or
services we may actually want. While I think there must be a logical limit to
this information (for example, as nice as it would be for impartial computers to
replace loan offices, being able to recognize subtle human behavior and individual
traits is critical), for now it can be used as a positive development for both
marketers and consumers.
No comments:
Post a Comment